|
THE
WATER ACCORD - 1991
KEY
NOTE
In
1991, an agreement to share waters of the Indus River was reached
between the four provinces of Pakistan in the form of the Water
Apportionment Accord (WAA). This accord is based on both, the existing
and future water needs of the four provinces.
The
Chief Ministers of the four provinces, in a unique demonstration
of mutual cooperation and national spirit, resolved the long outstanding
dispute, which had brought water development in the country to a
grinding halt.
HISTORIC
DEVELOPMENTS
Even
during the pre-partition era, there were episodes of contention
among various provinces of the sub-continent over water. As early
as 1920, during the period when Sutlej valley and Sukkur barrage
projects were under consideration, some doubts were expressed about
the availability of water for these projects. Moreover, Bhawalpur
State also protested against the allocation of waters to non-riparian
areas. The then Government of India persuaded the Punjab, Bhawalpur
and Bikanir states to sign an agreement called the Sutlej Valley
Tripartite Agreement of 1920.
During
the operation of the Sutlej valley projects, it was noted that river
supplies were short of assumed supplies particularly in the early
kharif period. To investigate this, a Sutlej Valley Project Inquiry
Committee was setup in 1932. Later, the Anderson Committee was set
up in 1935 to examine the distribution of water for Sutlej valley
projects, Sukkur barrage and other projects proposed by Punjab.
In
1939, the Government of Sindh lodged a complaint against the Government
of Punjab about the perceived effects of the Punjab projects on
inundation canals of Sindh and on Sukkur barrage. The Rau Commission
was constituted which presented its recommendations in 1942.
The
post-independence period has also witnessed similar events. In 1968,
under the chairmanship of Mr Akhtar Hussain, the Water Allocation
and Rates Committee was constituted by the Governor of former West
Pakistan to review barrage water allocations, reservoir release
patterns, drawdown levels and use of groundwater in relation to
surface water deliveries. The Committee submitted its report on
July 01, 1970 when the provinces were revived. No attention was
paid to this report.
As
a result, the Justice Fazle Akbar Committee was constituted in October
1970 to recommend apportionment of waters of the River Indus and
its tributaries. The Committee submitted its report in 1971. During
the same time period, ad hoc distribution of Chashma barrage and
later Tarbela reservoir storage among the provinces was ordered.
No decision was taken on the Fazle Akbar Committee recommendations
and water continued to be distributed on ad hoc orders by the Government
of Pakistan.
In
1977, the Government of Pakistan established another commission
comprising the Chief Justices of the High Courts of the Provinces,
headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to examine the
issue of water apportionment. The report of this commission is still
pending with the Government of Pakistan.
It
was finally the Chief Ministers of the provinces who managed to
reach consensus on the contentious issue. The breakthrough came
in a series of meeting, first in Lahore and finally on March 16
in Karachi.
THE
PURPOSE OF THE WATER ACCORD
Surface
water developments after the final commissioning of the Tarbela
Dam Project in 1977, were almost stalled due to the non-resolution
of the inter-provincial water dispute. The country underwent a one
and a half decade long crisis related to irrigation supplies and
hydropower generation before reaching consensus. Load-shedding and
irregular agriculture produce was observed during this period. An
inter-provincial agreement became essential to solve the longstanding
dispute of canal water uses, shares in the river supplies and surplus
flows in the form of floods, etc.
An
agreement called the "Apportionment of the Water of the Indus
River System between Provinces" was arrived upon, which had
two important features:
i.
It protected the existing uses of canal water in each province.
ii. It apportions the balance of river supplies, including flood
surpluses and future storages among the provinces.
THE
WATER APPORTIONMENT ACCORD - 1991
The
Water Apportionment Accord was agreed upon on March 16, 1991 at
Karachi in a meeting of the Chief Minister's of the four provinces
along with several provincial representatives. The accord allocates
the following share to provinces:
|
Province |
Kharif
(MAF) |
Rabi
(MAF) |
Total
(MAF) |
Punjab |
37.07 |
18.87 |
55.94 |
| Sindh
* |
33.94 |
14.82 |
48.76 |
| NWFP
(a) |
3.48 |
2.3 |
5.78 |
|
(b) Civil Canals ** |
1.80 |
1.2 |
3.00 |
| Balochistan
|
2.85 |
1.02 |
3.87 |
| Total |
77.34 |
37.01 |
114.35 |
| ** |
1.8 |
1.2 |
3 |
| *
Including already sanctioned Urban and Industrial uses for
Metropolitan Karachi. |
| **
Ungauged Civil Canals above the rim stations |
- The
NWFP/ Balochistan projects, under execution, were provided their
authorized quota of water as existing uses.
- Balance
river supplies (including flood supplies and future storages)
was to be distributed as below:
|
Punjab |
Sindh |
Balochistan |
NWFP |
Total |
| 37 |
37 |
12 |
14 |
100
% |
-
Industrial and Urban Water supplies for Metropolitan City, for
which there were sanctioned allocations, was to be accorded priority.
- The
need for storages, wherever feasible on the Indus and other rivers
was admitted and recognized by the participants for planned future
agricultural development.
- The
need for certain minimum escapage to sea, below Kotri, to check
sea intrusion was recognized. Sindh held the view, that the optimum
level was 10 MAF, which was discussed at length, while other studies
indicated lower/high figures. It was, therefore, decided that
further studies would be undertaken to establish the minimal escapage
needs downstream Kotri.
- There
would be no restrictions on the provinces to undertake new projects
within their agreed shares.
- No
restrictions were placed on small schemes not exceeding 5,000
acres above elevation of 1200 ft. SPD.
- No
restrictions were placed on developing irrigation uses in the
Kurram / Gomal / Kohat basins, so long as these do not adversely
affect the existing uses on these rivers.
- There
were no restrictions on Balochistan, to develop the water resources
of the Indus right bank tributaries, flowing through its areas.
- The
requirements of LBOD would be met out of the flood supplies in
accordance with the agreed sharing formula.
- For
the implementation of this accord, the need to establish an Indus
River System Authority was recognized and accepted. It was to
have headquarters at Lahore and representation from all the four
province.
(i)
The system-wise allocation would be worked out separately, on ten
daily basis and attached with the agreement as part and parcel of
it.
(ii)
The record of actual average system uses for the period 1977-82,
would form the guide line for developing a future regulation pattern.
These ten daily uses would be adjusted pro-rata to correspond to
the indicated seasonal allocations of the different canal systems
and would form the basis for sharing shortages and surpluses on
all Pakistan basis.
(iii)
The existing reservoirs would be operated with priority for the
irrigation uses of the Provinces
(iv)
The provinces would have the freedom within their allocations to
modify system-wise and period-wise uses.
(v)
All efforts would be made to avoid wastages. Any surpluses may be
used by another province, but this would not establish any rights
to such uses.
DISCUSSION ON THE ACCORD
The
Water Apportionment Accord allocated about 12 MAF of additional
water to the four provinces for priority irrigation development.
It also specified sharing percentages for the provinces out of balance
river supplies for further development. Hence, the Water Apportionment
Accord envisaged long-term surface water development in Pakistan,
which should lead to ultimate canal head diversions of about 131
MAF.
Surplus
river water is available only between 70-100 days during the flood
season (June-September). Water Apportionment Accord has also specified
10 daily allocations of various provincial projects throughout the
year, which take into account the additional allocations. To provide
these additional allocations during the non-flood period of the
year, it is necessary to store the surplus water.
In
the absence of new storage facilities, the provinces will be forced
to share the shortages and in this scenario, the largest suffering
will be transferred on to the new irrigation projects. Hence it
is in the interest of all provinces to encourage the development
of water resources projects in order to increase national storage
capacity.
CURRENT
CONDITION OF RIVER WATERS
Pakistan
has been facing drought conditions for the past 3 years. Moreover,
seasonal and hydrologic variations, escapages to sea and canal water
diversions create a huge imbalance in water availability.
The
following tables have been generated for both kharif and rabi seasons
using statistics at the first rim station on the Indus system -
the Tarbela Rim Station. Averages of post-Tarbela period i.e. 1975-2000
have been calculated for the three western rivers.
A similar
exercise has been undertaken for the three eastern rivers for the
period 1990-2000. Average escapages below Kotri are also averaged
for the period of 1975-2000 for both kharif and rabi. Finally, the
canal water diversions are calculated for averages between the years
1975-2000 for both kharif and rabi.
It
may be noted that the Water Accord allocates a total of 114.35 for
the four provinces for canal water diversions whereas the averages
are far below the amount of water allocated for development and
implementation of irrigation projects. These facts clearly indicate
the urgent need for development of water storage projects.
| |
Rim
Station Inflow of Indus River and its Western Tributaries |
| 1975-2000 |
Kharif |
Rabi |
Annual |
| Average
MAF |
118.99 |
25.92 |
144.91 |
|
Eastern
Rivers Inflow at Rim Stations |
| 1990-2000 |
Kharif |
Rabi |
Annual
Total |
| Average
MAF |
7.446 |
1.69 |
9.136 |
| |
Outflow
to Sea below Kotri |
| 1975-2000 |
Kharif |
Rabi |
Annual |
| Average
MAF |
37.01 |
2.49 |
39.5 |
| |
Canal
Water Diversions |
| 1975-2000 |
Kharif |
Rabi |
Annual |
| Average
MAF |
67.11 |
37.63 |
104.73 |
REFERENCES
1.
Dr. Bashir A Chandio and Ms Nuzhat Yasmin, "Proceedings of
the National Workshop on Water Resources Achievements and Issues
in 20th Century and Challenges for the Next Millennium", Pakistan
Council of Research in Water Resources, June 1999.
2. Centre of Excellence in Water Resources Engineering, Lahore,
"Proceedings - Water for the 21st Century: Demand, Supply,
Development and Socio- Environmental Issues", June 1997.
3. Asian Development Bank - TA, Water Resources Sector Strategy,
"National Water Sector Profile", April 2002
4. Dr. Nazir Ahmad, "Water Resources of Pakistan", Miraj
uddin Press, Lahore September 1993. |