|
THERMAL AND NUCLEAR POWER
POWER GENERATION CAPACITY OF PAKISTAN
The total power generation capacity in Pakistan is of the order
of 17,457 MW. This includes the hydropower generation capacity of
5,013 MW, thermal power generation capacity of 12,169 MW and nuclear
power generation capacity of 462 MW. Based on the present generation
capacity the hydro: thermal/ nuclear mix in the country is 29: 71.
SOURCES OF ELECTRICITY
The main sources of electricity generation in Pakistan are hydel,
oil, gas, coal and nuclear. Thermal power is produced using furnace
oil, diesel, coal and gas as raw material, all of which are fossil
fuels. Thermal and nuclear power are expensive compared to hydel
power where the water used is a renewable commodity. Nuclear power
has not developed according to expectation in Pakistan due to certain
external factors.
In 2000-01, the total electricity generated was 68,117 Giga-Watts-Hours
(GWh), of which 71.5% was produced from a thermal source.

POWER DEMAND OF PAKISTAN
According to WAPDA's estimate, the provincial power demands in
Pakistan are:
- Punjab: The current power demand in the Punjab is about 7,027
MW which is expected to rise to 29,103 MW in 2024-25 under the
most conservative growth rate of 6.1%.
- Sindh: The current power demand of 2,642 MW in Sindh is expected
to rise to 10,993 MW in 2024-25.
- NWFP: The current power demand of 1,697 MW in NWFP is expected
to rise to 7,018 MW in 2024-25.
- Balochistan: In Balochistan, the current power demand of 474
MW is expected to rise to 1,964 MW in 2024-25.

MERITS AND DEMERITS OF THERMAL POWER
THERMAL VS. HYDEL |
MERITS |
DEMERITS |
- Transmission cost
of thermal power is much less compared to hydel power because
thermal power stations are located closer to the distribution
centers.
- Thermal power production
is more demand-driven and can accommodate daily, seasonal
and annual fluctuations and peaking requirements.
- Thermal power stations
can be designed and constructed in relatively less time
and therefore, are planned for short/ medium-term needs.
- Mostly, thermal
power stations do not cause displacement problems.
- Initial capital
cost of thermal projects is relatively less, compared to
hydel projects.
|
-
The cost of power per unit from a thermal power station
is much higher compared to hydel and in the longer term,
thermal becomes an expensive proposition.
-
Thermal power stations use non-renewable fossil fuel as
raw material.
-
SO2, NOx, Particulate Matter pollution
are a big problem from thermal power stations.
-
In case of Pakistan, thermal power production is a burden
on the national economy because its raw material has to
be imported, which consumes a huge amount of foreign exchange.
-
Thermal power stations do not add towards recreation, aesthetics,
wetlands, fisheries, etc
|
NUCLEAR POWER ASSESSMENT
There are only two nuclear generation centers in Pakistan - Karachi
Nuclear Power Plant (KANUPP) producing 137 MW of power and Chashma
Nuclear Power Plant (CHASHNUPP) with an installed capacity of 325
MW. The total nuclear power capacity is 462 MW, which is only 2.9%
of the total generation. KANUPP and CHASHNUPP are the first two
nuclear power plant of the Islamic world.
Canada supplied the reactor for the heavy water based, Karachi
Nuclear Power Plant and a heavy-water production facility in 1972.
However, in 1976, it abruptly stopped supplying fuel after which
Pakistan started construction of the first uranium-enrichment centrifuge
at Kahuta.
German and British firms sold vacuum pumps/ equipment and high
efficiency inverters for the centrifuge in 1977. China provided
assistance and equipment all through for KANUPP and later for CHASHNUP.
KANUPP has completed its 30 years life and is now producing only
70 MW due to certain upgradations by Pakistani engineers. Of the
total power produced, KANUPP consumes 10 MW for its own operations.
CHASHNUPP is being set up by Chinese assistance and is running on
liquid fuel.
The growth of nuclear plants in Pakistan has been stifled due to
international agendas and pressures. Moreover, in the 21st century,
nuclear power plants are not considered a very favorable option,
due to the huge costs of decommissioning and catastrophes of national
scale, in case of accident.
THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECTS
Thermal Power Stations are operated by three institutions: WAPDA
operates 11 stations; KESC operates 4 stations; and IPPs (Independent
Power Producers) who run their private power stations are operating
at least 14.

GENERATION COST
The cost of generation of thermal energy by WAPDA establishments
was Rs. 2.48 approximately whereas that of hydel was Rs. 0.2 in
the year 2000-01. There are transmission and distribution costs
added to these figures.
The consumer pays a much higher cost per unit of electricity consumed.
This is because of pilferages, surcharges and 71.5% thermal-based
electricity on the national grid. The average price in Pakistan
is Rs. 4.5 per unit of electricity consumed.
UTILIZATION FACTOR
The Utilization Factor indicates the amount of energy utilized
against the total available energy. This can also be interpreted
by the energy consumed vs. installed capacity.
The Utilization Factor of thermal energy is usually higher compared
to hydel because thermal or nuclear plants can be run at the desired
capacity and their costs and overheads also reduce proportionately
whereas hydel is dependent on the water head in the reservoir.
Utilization Factor also changes from year to year depending upon
variation in national needs. The utilization factor of thermal energy
in Pakistan for the year 2000-01 ranged between approximately 4.5
- 98 %. A low utilization factor indicates shut down of the power
plant for a significant time period and hence is not a potential
loss.
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS (IPPs)
Private power plants were mostly installed during the late 80s
and early 90s after the load-shedding rises of the 1980s. KAPCO
and HUBCO are the two largest IPPs in Pakistan. According to the
Power Policy 1994 agreements of IPPs with the Government of Pakistan,
WAPDA/KESC is bound to buy the power produced by them at a mutually
agreed rate.
Some of the IPPs are producing power for their industrial requirement.
It is estimated that such IPPs are producing about 1,000 MW.
REFERENCES
1. Hydrocarbon Development Institute of Pakistan, "Pakistan
Energy Yearbook 2001", January 2002.
2. The Associated Press, "Nuclear History In India, Pakistan,"
New York Times, May 28, 1998 http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/nuchist.htm
3. CNS - Chronology of Pakistan Nuclear Development, http://www.cns.miis.edu/research/india/paknucch.htm
|