WATER IS EVERYONE’S BUSINESS:
PUBLIC CONSULTATION FOR WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES OF PAKISTAN
By Farhan Sami, Head, Society, Economy and Environment
Group, IUCN – The World Conservation Union, Pakistan
Programme
By the year 2000, the world had built more
than 45,000 large dams - to manage flood waters, to harness
water as hydropower, to supply water to drink or for industry,
or to irrigate fields. These have been important means of
meeting needs for water and energy services and have served
as long-term, strategic investments with the ability to deliver
multiple benefits. Often, however, an unacceptable and unnecessary
price has been paid to secure these benefits, especially in
social and environmental terms, by people displaced, by communities
downstream, by taxpayers and by the natural environment.
Debate over the last fifty years has provided
some understanding of the complex choices facing societies
in meeting their water and energy needs and the role of large
dams. But it has also highlighted the performance and the
social and environmental impacts of large dams. In the late
seventies, as the basis for decision-making became more open,
inclusive and transparent globally, the decision to build
large dams began to be increasingly contested, to the point
where the future of large dam-building was in question. The
enormous investments and widespread impacts of large dams
saw conflicts flare up over the siting and impacts of large
dams - both those in place and those on the drawing board.
Proponents pointed to social and economic development
demands that dams meet, such as irrigation, electricity, flood
control and water supply. Opponents pointed to adverse impacts,
such as debt burden, cost overruns, displacement of people,
destruction of ecosystems, and the inequitable sharing of
costs and benefits. The breakdown of dialogue on the construction
of dams - between NGOs, the private sector, governments and
international organisations - imposed considerable costs on
all parties.
In April 1997, representatives of diverse interests
met in Gland, Switzerland with support from the World Bank
and IUCN - The World Conservation Union, to discuss the role
of large dams in development. The workshop brought together
participants from governments, the private sector, international
financial institutions, civil society organisations and affected
people. Participants agreed upon the formation of an independent
commission called the World Commission on Dams (WCD) with
a mandate to review the development effectiveness of large
dams and develop internationally acceptable criteria, guidelines
and standards for large dams.
In order to cater to these growing and urgent
needs, a project called the “World Commission on Dams
– Consultative Process in Pakistan” has been executed
jointly by IUCN – The World Conservation Union and the
Pakistan Water Partnership under the guidance of the WCD Council
and with the financial assistance of the Royal Netherlands
Embassy.
The aim was to generate recommendations for
policy reforms by analyzing, reviewing, and studying the Dams
and Development Report of the WCD with particular reference
to public policy in Pakistan. Further, the IUCN hoped to contribute
to the formulation of a shared view around the current socio-economic
and environmental issues that relate to water conservation,
in general, and large dams, in particular.
The outputs of the project include the formation
of a WCD Council, the organisation of six nation-wide consultative
workshops on distinct themes, and the generation of a panel
discussion on the core values of the WCD Report to develop
policy recommendations. For the dissemination of the Report
and its findings, a WCD website, a water portal, fact sheets,
and a situational analysis of the water sector have been prepared,
along with a translation into Urdu and Sindhi of selected
sections of the Report. Most of this information is available
at: www.wcdcpp.iucnp.org .
Six one-day, multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral
national consultative workshops were organized under the WCD
CPP at Quetta, Skardu, Lahore, Peshawar, Khalabut (Haripur)
and Hyderabad by IUCNP and PWP. Each of the national workshops
deliberated upon a distinct and independent theme of local
importance, with the objective of reviewing WCD’s strategic
priorities, guidelines and recommendations in the national
context, and enabling participants to provide feedback on
the WCD Report. The themes of these workshops were: 1. Water
Management Options – Impacts on Land, Agriculture and
Livelihoods; 2. Upstream Riparian Rights and the Context of
Water Infrastructure Development; 3. Decision-making for Sustainable
Investment in Water Sector Infrastructure Projects; 4. Integrated
Flood Management Options to Reduce Vulnerability of Communities;
5. Mitigating Social Impacts of Large Dams; and 6. Environmental
Flows Requirement – Impact on Aquatic Life, Biodiversity,
Floodplains and Ecosystems. The workshops advocated consultative
decision-making based on sound scientific principles and keeping
in view national and local context, needs and opinions. Independent
direction and strategic guidance was provided to the process
by the WCD Council, which helped ensure its credibility and
neutrality.
The Final outcome of the WCD CPP is a Draft Policy Brief that
will synthesize the opinion of water experts, analyse the
recommendations of the consultative process and incorporate
the observations/recommendations of a policy gap analysis.
The Policy Brief will evolve out of the umbrella framework
of the current policies of Pakistan and provide a futuristic
direction for sustainable water and development projects in
Pakistan.
The WCD CPP project was based on the notion
that water was everyone's business, especially since one use
of water has repercussions for another. The workshops emphasized
many elements and principles of vital importance to find balanced
solutions to contentious water issues. The involvement of
all relevant stakeholders and consideration of diverse viewpoints
was encouraged. Participants were allowed to define problems,
discuss issues of local importance, state their interests
and try to evolve agreeable options for the improved management
of water.
|