It is not a fruitful idea to keep discussing as to
how much the number of people living below the poverty
line has come down during the last five years. Considering
that even with the reduced percentage, those suffering
from acute poverty are still too many to be left on
their own, now is the time to move on and discuss
what is the best strategy to reduce poverty and let
the economic grow at the same time.
The Planning Commission devised a multi-pronged approach
in 2005 in a Medium Term Development Framework (MTDF)
to promote pro-poor economic growth. The framework
also made a specific allocations of Rs 712 billion
and reduce poverty. But the planning gurus seem to
have missed the fundamental ingredient of an effective
strategy to reduce poverty -- providing sustainable
and affordable energy to the less developed areas
of the country where most of the poor live.
The immediate model in this regard is China where
providing people with cheap hydel energy was part
of that country's poverty alleviation campaign in
the mid-1980s. A key factor in China's successful
electrification programme through hydel energy was
Beijing's determination and ability to mobilise resource
at the local level. Though the electrification programme
was backed by subsidies and low-interest loans, it
also benefited from the very cheap domestic production
of equipment ranging from hydro-power generators to
light bulbs. India is another country in the region
which has followed the same policy. By developing
small hydro-power projects at an accelerated pace,
it has addressed the problem poverty in rural areas.
During the last five years, India's central government
has completed 90 small hydro-power projects which
can generate 270 megawatts of electricity.
Despite these success stories in our own neighborhood,
our energy gurus are either stuck with construction
of big dams or with experimenting for expensive alternatives
like wind energy. It is important to understand that
wind energy is not only expensive, it needs a lot
of space to generate power. A recent report by US
Agency for International Development (USAID), which
makes a cost comparison of different technologies
to harness green energy in south Asia, proves that
hydel energy is five to ten times cheaper than wind
and solar energy respectively.
In solar energy Pakistan's past experience has not
been a happy one. Two solar energy stations set up
in 1984 and abandoned since then are a strong reminder
that we better not experiment with it again. This
leaves us with only economically viable option to
provide energy to the poorest of the poor and that
is through harnessing hydel-power. It is best suited
for our unique set of circumstances and long experience
of over hundred years in hydro-power generation. We
also have sufficient engineering and technical know
how to go ahead with it. State-owned Heavy Mechanical
Complex in Texila has the manufacturing facilities
to make hydro-power turbines.
In the Planning Commission's development framework,
Azad Jammu & Kashmir, the Northern Areas (NA)
and the northern districts of the Frontier province
are identified as being among the least developed
areas of the country. Majority of the population in
these regions lives in obscene levels of poverty and
exhibits lowest socio-economic indicators of well
being. These areas have an estimated population of
8.21 million spread over 11,3000 square kilometres.
They are poor mostly due to their far-flung locations
and inadequate linkage with the more developed areas.
On the other hand, this entire region is known as
a goldmine for generation hydro-power. This flies
in the face of the fact that most of the population
there does not have access to any energy, let alone
a cheap one. The efforts by the provincial governments
to fill the gap in rural power supply on their own
has not improved the situation at all. Some provincial
departments and NGOs like Aga Khan Foundation have
introduced some community-based small hydro-power
stations (producing 20-30 kilowatts of electricity)
in parts of the Frontier and the Northern Areas but
the majority of the stations they have installed are
very basic in design and can be used for lighting
only. They do not allow productive use of energy for
income generation.
No one, therefore, should be surprised to know the
extreme levels of poverty in the Northern Areas, where
per capita income is merely 100 dollars and per capita
electricity consumption 0.05 kilowatts, the lowest
in Pakistan. The principal forms of energy consumed
in the area are electricity generated from small hydroelectric
power stations generating only 46 megawatts of power
which falls much short of 95 megawatts, the actual
demand in the areas. This gap in supply and demand
is filled by diesel power generators, firewood, kerosene
oil and batteries. Non-availability of stable and
affordable energy sources is resulting in tremendous
pressure on the forests in the areas, causing indiscriminate
cutting of trees which, if allowed to continue at
the current pace, will eliminate all forests in the
next few years. A forestry institute in Peshawar,
in its recent report, has warned that the current
rate of deforestation in Pakistan is so high that
if it goes on unchecked it can lead to complete elimination
of forest cover by 2010.
This creates ironies of its own. The development
framework offers a roadmap for increasing the national
forest cover from 4.8 per cent to 4.9 per cent in
2005 and 5.2 per cent in 2010. These targets cannot
be realised without analysing ground realties and
providing alternative sources of energy to people
living in and around forests. According to some estimates,
206 megawatts of power are required to preserve the
forests of the Northern Areas alone by 2016. This
can be easily met by installing small hydro-power
projects which, when and if they become operational,
will can have a maximum capacity of producing 579
megawatts of electricity.
Though the government's development framework acknowledges
that hydel-power generation from the Indus river and
its tributaries can become a major source of development
in the Northern Areas, not a single penny has been
allocated for the purpose. Perhaps the authorities
are waiting for a complete vanishing of the forest
before they swing in to action.
If this hydro-power generation potential can be realised
it will also reduce, almost eliminate, the local people's
dependency on kerosene oil and diesel which reach
these areas after their market price is further increased
by the heavy transportation cost to bring them to
this hilly and remote region. Provision of cheap energy
through hydel sources will also decrease eye and respiratory
diseases, which are very common in the Northern Areas
due to excessive use of oil and firewood for cooking
and heating. In the absence of clean energy sources,
families are condemned to live in a single smoke-filled
room.
How cheap hydel energy helps to eradicate poverty
is shown by the success story of an entrepreneur who
installed a one-megawatt hydel power project in Chitral
in the year 2001 along with complete distribution
network for the southern part of Chitral city. The
project has changed the socio-economic conditions
of the area by providing electricity to run machinery
and equipment for the manufacturing and processing
of local goods. This locally-generated energy is also
creating skilled job opportunities in the power supply
system as well as in workshops for making electric
appliances and fixing electric installations. Small
and medium industries like wool weaving, walnut oil
extraction, walnut juice pressing, fruit drying and
its preservation and packaging, chilling stores, marble
and slate cutting and polishing and cutting gems cutting
can immensely benefit through this cheap energy.
If cheap hydel-power generation through small, local
power generation and supply systems, can be successfully
realised it will help the government save money needed
for linking remote areas with the national grid. This
money in turn can be used for other productive, poverty-alleviation
purposes.
http://jang.com.pk/thenews/aug2006-weekly/nos-20-08-2006/pol1.htm#2